What is the difference between RUM (Real User Monitoring) vs. Synthetic monitoring?

RUM, or Real User Monitoring, is a type of monitoring that involves tracking the performance of a website or application as experienced by actual users. This type of monitoring can provide valuable insights into how a website or application is performing in the wild, and can help identify issues that may not be apparent when using other types of monitoring.

Synthetic monitoring, on the other hand, involves using simulated traffic to test the performance of a website or application. This type of monitoring can be useful for providing a baseline measure of performance, and can be used to test specific user journeys or transactions on a website or application.

The main difference between RUM and synthetic monitoring is that RUM involves tracking the performance of a website or application as experienced by real users, while synthetic monitoring involves using simulated traffic to test performance. Both approaches have their own strengths and weaknesses, and can be used together to provide a more complete picture of a website or application’s performance.

What is RUM (Real User Monitoring) and how it helps in performance testing?

Real User Monitoring (RUM) is a method of monitoring the performance of a website or web application as experienced by actual users. This type of monitoring involves tracking various metrics, such as page load times, server response times, and JavaScript execution times, from the perspective of the user’s web browser.

This type of monitoring uses data collected from user interactions with the application to provide insight into how the application is performing in the real world.

RUM typically involves the use of JavaScript code that is added to the application’s web pages. This code is used to collect data on the performance of the application, including information about page load times, user interactions, and any errors that may occur. This data is then sent to a central server for analysis and can be used to identify potential performance issues and improve the overall user experience.

In the context of Application Performance Management (APM), RUM can be used to supplement traditional server-side monitoring techniques. By providing a more complete picture of how an application is performing from the user’s perspective, RUM can help organizations identify and resolve performance issues more quickly and effectively.

RUM is useful for performance testing because it provides valuable insights into how a website or web application is actually performing in the wild. By tracking metrics like page load times and server response times, RUM can help identify performance bottlenecks and other issues that may not be apparent when testing in a controlled environment. This can help organizations optimize the performance of their websites and web applications, leading to a better user experience.

Benefits of API Test Automation over UI Test Automation? – Mostly asked Interview Question

API testing has many benefits over UI testing:

  • First, API testing is much faster than UI testing. This is because API tests do not have to wait for a page to load, as they interact directly with the application’s backend.
  • Second, API tests are more reliable than UI tests. This is because UI tests are subject to the vagaries of the user interface, such as changes in the layout or position of elements. API tests, on the other hand, are not affected by such changes.
  • Third, API tests are easier to create and maintain than UI tests. This is because UI tests often require a lot of code to simulate user interactions, whereas API tests only need to make calls to the application’s API.
  • Fourth, with API testing, one can find bugs related to functionality, reliability, performance, and security early in the SDLC and hence those are cheaper to fix.

In conclusion, API testing has many advantages over UI testing, and should be used whenever possible.


Download android app Software Testing – Full Stack QE / SDET and get the early access.